Email subject line generator
Tell us what you sell and why you're writing today. You get eight lines built for cold outreach, scored on length, spam risk and personalization.
Leave it empty and we write a merge tag instead ๐
All free. We won't even ask for your email ๐
Tell me a bit more about what you sell so I can write something useful ๐
Writing eight of them for you...
Three examples before you type anything
Already wrote one? Let's score it
Paste a subject line and get the same three scores, the same inbox preview, and one thing to fix.
This generator writes subject lines for cold outreach, not for newsletters. That distinction matters more than you'd think: a line that works on a list of 40,000 subscribers who opted in will get you ignored by a stranger reading on a phone between two meetings.
Fair warning before you scroll. The subject line is the smallest part of the problem, and we'd rather say that now than sell you a magic template.
A great line to the wrong person still fails
Get your first leads for freeTable of contents
Three fields, one dropdown, no account. Here's what to put in each one.
Hit generate and you get eight lines, each one sitting inside a phone inbox mock so you can watch where your line gets cut off. Take two. Send them to different halves of your list, wait a week, and keep the winner. If you can't answer the "why now" question, that's worth noticing, and we'll come back to it further down.
Each line carries three scores, the ones you'd otherwise eyeball. Length is the number of characters, and green stops before 40. Spam risk counts the words filters were trained on years ago, plus capitals and exclamation marks. Personalization checks one thing, whether the line names their company or the reason you picked today. A line can pass all three and still be the wrong line to send, which is the point of the last section on this page.
Start with the uncomfortable number. In the biggest public dataset on outreach, Backlinko and Pitchbox analyzed 12 million outreach emails and found that only 8.5 percent of them got any response at all. The other 91.5 percent went nowhere, and plenty of them were perfectly well written.
The same study found that personalized subject lines lifted response rates by 30.5 percent, which makes it the biggest single lever in the dataset. Personalized here doesn't mean a first name dropped into a template, and it never did. It means the line could not have been sent to anybody else.
One more number before you optimize anything: open rates lie now. Apple's Mail Privacy Protection downloads remote content in the background whether the recipient engages or not, so a large share of your reported opens never happened. Reply rate, dull as it is, is the only number left that tells you the truth.
What to do with that. Stop A/B testing subject lines against open rate. Test them against replies instead. That takes longer to reach significance, and it's the only version of the test that means anything.
These are the thirty lines the generator draws from, grouped by the moment you're writing in. Swap the placeholders for your own words. All lowercase is deliberate: a subject line in title case looks like a campaign, and a lowercase one looks like a person typed it in a hurry.
The strongest category by far, because they answer the only question the recipient's asking: why you, and why today.
Harder. These lines admit it instead of hiding it, and the self-deprecating ones outperform the clever ones because they lower the stakes of opening.
Follow-ups are where most of the replies come from, and the subject line usually gets recycled from the first email. Give it its own line instead. If you want the message underneath as well, our tool for the follow-up itself drafts it by scenario.
The breakup email has a bad reputation, mostly because people write it passive aggressively. Drop the passive aggression and it's often the highest reply-rate email in the whole sequence.
Once there's a conversation, the subject line does a different job. By then it has one job, which is making the calendar step feel small.
People ask this constantly, so here's the answer. The 30/30/50 rule splits the outcome of a cold email into three parts: 30 percent from the subject line and the opening, 30 percent from the body, and 50 percent from the follow-up. The numbers pass a hundred on purpose, because every follow-up compounds on work the first email already did. No controlled study produced those figures. They're a rule of thumb, one that circulated among sending teams and stuck.
The versions disagree with each other too. Some people swap the first 30 for list quality, which tilts the whole framework toward who you picked instead of what you wrote. Both camps can't be right, and the disagreement is the interesting part. What survives every version is the ceiling: your subject line is worth about a third, and never more. Spend the rest on the body, and more of it on the messages that come after. Our twelve templates that get replies cover both, and this page covers the line at the top.
Fake "RE:" and "Fwd:" prefixes. They still work on the open, which is exactly the problem. The recipient realizes within a second that you lied to get in, and that's the last thought they have about your company.
Full caps and multiple exclamation marks. Filters have been reading those two signals for twenty years, and they read yours in milliseconds. You're not being bold, you're being classified. The scorer on this page flags both.
The name-only line. "John" or "John, quick question" was clever in 2018. Everybody does it now, and it reads as automation instead of attention.
Emojis in B2B cold email. Test them if you like, but they don't render the same way across clients and they can tip a borderline email into the promotions tab.
A line written for the sender. "Introducing Acme, the leading platform for..." is a line about you. Nobody opens an email about a stranger's company. If your opening sentence has the same problem, our opener tool builds it from something the person did instead.
The best line in the world can't fix bad timing
Thirty buying signals, one filter against your ICP, and a first line built on whatever triggered the lead.
See who moved this weekFounders who prospect themselves
You write every email yourself between two other jobs. You need a starting point at nine in the evening, not a copywriting course.
Sales teams of 2 to 10
No copywriter, no enablement function, no library of approved templates. Three people who all write differently, and who need one common baseline.
Anyone under 500 emails a month
At that volume you can still think about every email before it goes out. That's where personalization beats automation.
If you send fifty thousand emails a month, this tool isn't for you and neither is the advice around it. Everything here is calibrated for small teams, sending a few hundred emails to people they picked one by one. Once the line works, the body of the email and the pitch it leads to have their own free tools here.
Nobody selling a subject line generator says this part out loud. You can write the best line of your career and still get nothing back, because the person had no reason to care this week.
Most of the pages ranking on this query belong to sending platforms, so their answer is that deliverability beats copy and you should buy their sender. That's true as far as it goes. It also skips the step underneath both: your line and your inbox placement each assume you already picked the right person to write to. Volume is what happens when you skip that step, and volume has a price now. Google holds bulk senders to a spam complaint rate below 0.3 percent, which is a hard number to stay under when the list was never chosen.
Think about the last cold email you actually replied to. It probably wasn't the wording that got you. It was the timing: you were looking for exactly that thing, or you had just taken over that problem, or somebody on your team had raised it three days earlier. The line only had to stay out of the way.
That's the whole reason we built Gojiberry the way we did. For Mindflow, moving to intent-based outbound lifted their reply rate by 31 percent, with the same team writing in the same voice. Nothing about their copy changed. What changed was who received it and when.
60%
of Wispra's weekly demos now come from intent signals
+31%
reply rate for Mindflow on intent-based outbound
100+
meetings for GTE Localize after moving off email only outbound
Gojiberry is an AI-powered multichannel prospecting platform. It tracks more than 30 buying intent signals across socials and the web, surfaces the leads who are actively looking right now, and triggers personalized outreach across several channels. That's the whole product, in one sentence.
In practice, that reverses the order of the work. You don't start with a blank subject line, you start with a reason. Somebody took over a team, somebody raised a round, somebody started engaging with your category. The agent checks them against your ICP, drops the ones who were never going to buy, and writes the opening around the signal that surfaced them.
Pro is $99 a month, flat for the whole team, and covers two social senders with unlimited campaigns. You can keep using this generator alongside it, and plenty of people do. One tool gives you the words, the other one gives you the timing. If you only have budget for one, take the timing.
Why we built this in the first place
Before Gojiberry there was Coco.ai. Roman spent his days prospecting on socials for it, and the part that never scaled was not the writing, it was the search. He read through activity by hand, spotted who had just changed roles or started engaging with the category, and wrote to those people first, because they were the ones who answered.
It worked well enough to be frustrating. One person can hold maybe thirty accounts in their head, and no more than that. Past that, you go back to blasting a list. Coco.ai is where we learned which signals were worth acting on, and Gojiberry is that manual routine running on its own. We lived the problem for years before we sold anybody the answer.
That history, more than any product decision, is why the free tools on this blog stop where they stop. A generator hands you a line. It can't tell you the account is hiring for the exact role you sell into, and that gap is the whole product.
It runs in your browser and pulls from a library of thirty subject lines built for cold outreach, sorted by the reason you're writing. Your answers fill the placeholders and the tool returns eight lines that fit your situation, each one scored and previewed the way a phone would show it.
There's no AI model behind it and we're not going to pretend otherwise. A model would give you more variety, and more filler with it. These thirty lines are the ones we send.
Short, lowercase, and tied to something that happened to them. Under forty characters so a phone shows all of it, a single idea, and no promise the email underneath doesn't keep. "congrats on the round" beats "Introducing Acme, the leading revenue platform" every single time.
If you can name their company or what set the email off today, put that in. If you can't name either, the line isn't the problem you should be fixing.
Name the role and drop everything else. "application for the backend role" or "portfolio, backend engineer" tells a hiring manager what the email's about in four words. Recruiters sort by role first, then by everything else.
Two things to skip: your own name, which they can see in the sender field, and anything clever. A hiring inbox rewards whatever is easiest to file.
Free, no account, no email address, no credit card. Nothing you type is sent anywhere, so it doesn't stop working when your connection drops.
For cold outreach, six words or fewer. Most mobile clients cut the line off around forty characters, and that's where most first opens happen. The inbox preview above shows you where your own line gets cut, on the width a phone gives you.
The research disagrees with itself here. The Backlinko study found longer subject lines outperformed short ones by 24.6 percent, but that dataset is mostly link-building outreach to publishers rather than sales email to buyers. Test it on your own list before you trust either answer.
The ones tied to something that just happened. A new role, a funding round, an open job, a public post about the problem you solve. They answer the only question the recipient has, which is why today.
Second best is the low-pressure line, the "probably not for you" family. It converts because it costs nothing to open.
In B2B cold email, they mostly hurt. They render inconsistently across clients, they read as marketing, and they can push a borderline email into the promotions tab.
In newsletters to people who subscribed, the calculation is different. Don't carry a newsletter habit into a cold inbox.
No. It lifts opens and destroys the conversation. The recipient works out in about one second that there wasn't a previous thread, and the only thing they remember about your company is that it lied to get their attention.
Yes, at low volume and with a chosen list. The 8.5 percent response rate in the Backlinko dataset covers everything sent, and most of it went to people who didn't have a reason to answer. Small teams write a few hundred emails to accounts they picked themselves, and they land nowhere near that average.
What stopped working is volume. Google and Yahoo now hold bulk senders to complaint thresholds that a scraped list breaks within a week, and every inbox provider has kept tightening since. Cold email is fine. Cold blasting is finished.
Yes, they're plain text. Copy a line and paste it wherever you send from. If your tool uses merge fields, replace the placeholders in curly brackets with your own variables.
No. Everything happens in your browser, and nothing is sent to a server. Close the tab and it's gone, including the lines you generated and anything you pasted into the scorer.
You have the words. Now get the timing
More than 30 intent signals watched for you, an ICP filter that drops the wrong people, and a first line built on the reason they showed up.
Start free on your market Read four customer storiesStart Now and Get New High Intent Leads Delivered Straight to Slack or Your Inbox.