3 questions · 40 seconds
Which AI sales agent fits your team?
No email required.
Question 1 / 3
Where do your leads come from today?
Question 2 / 3
Who approves the messages that go out?
Question 3 / 3
Who owns the tooling in your team?
🎯
Your answer
You want an autonomous agent
Nobody's arriving on their own yet, so something has to go out and find the accounts. Gojiberry watches more than 30 buying signals, checks each company against your ICP, and writes to the ones worth your week. 99 dollars a month covers the team.
Start free🧠
Your answer
You want an assistive agent
Your reps already sell well, and a copilot sharpens the preparation rather than the pipeline. Clay and Gong both do that job properly. Come to us instead if the thin part is the list those reps work from, because that's the half a copilot leaves alone.
See what we add🌐
Your answer
You want an inbound qualification agent
A chat agent answers the visitors you already earned, and it stops there. It won't raise the number of visitors. Gojiberry turns your ICP into a live list of companies that moved this week, so the outbound half stops depending on your traffic.
See the other halfAn AI sales agent runs the repetitive half of a sales development job on its own: it builds the target list, qualifies what it finds, sends outreach across several channels and updates the CRM behind it. Two families answer to that name, and they don't do the same job.
One family runs the whole loop with nobody watching. The other sits next to a rep who still presses send. This page separates the two, compares ten tools and prints what each one charges, because that's the number this category keeps quiet about.
Gojiberry finds your leads
Gojiberry runs two AI agents that watch more than 30 buying signals, check every account against your ICP, and reach out to the ones worth your time. 99 dollars a month for the team.
See who moved this weekTable of contents
How we checked this page
We opened every vendor pricing page in August 2026 and wrote down what each meter runs on: seats, researched contacts, leads contacted, credits. Then we read what each vendor puts in writing about commitments and add-ons, because that's where a bill moves after month two. Four of these ten publish nothing, so we say so and name the one public figure we could date.
One thing you won't find here: a scorecard of measured reply rates across ten agents. We haven't run a controlled test on an identical list, and an invented percentage would tell you less than this sentence admitting it. We pay for every plan ourselves, no vendor read a word of this before publication, and Gojiberry is our own product, which you should weigh when you reach the comparison table.
An AI sales agent is software that automates prospecting, lead qualification, multi-channel outreach and CRM updates. It doesn't work from a saved search: it works from an objective and a set of rules. It takes action instead of replying, and that one distinction separates it from a chatbot.
A chatbot waits for a question. An agent decides what to do next: it picks the account, writes the message, sends it, reads the reply and moves the record. You give it the ICP and the guardrails, and it won't stop to ask which step comes next.
Google's own overview of this query splits the category in two and then leaves the reader holding two questions it never answers: outbound or inbound, and fully autonomous or a human in the loop. Both answers sit in this section.
They find the leads, write the messages, handle the replies and book the meeting with nobody watching. You set the ICP, the positioning and the approval rules, then the agent works through the week. Nobody's rebuilding a saved search on Monday morning. The trade is control: an agent nobody supervises produces volume rather than pipeline.
Copilots research the account, draft the reply and flag what deserves attention. A person still presses send. They sharpen a rep who already has a list and a full calendar, and they don't fill either one. A team with nobody to sharpen gets very little back from one.
For a team of two to ten with nobody spare to supervise a machine, the autonomous family answers the question the assistive family leaves open: who goes on the list in the first place. Come to us instead if that list is the part you're still postponing to Friday.
Three capabilities separate a real agent from a sequencer with a chatbot bolted on. Check each one against the demo you're about to sit through.
The agent assembles the target list from databases, company sites and live signals rather than from an export that's out of date by Thursday. Timing is what that buys you. Median job tenure in the United States sits at 3.9 years, with 22 percent of employees in post under a year, so your market reshuffles its buying committees while your spreadsheet stands still. The same arithmetic hits the data itself: B2B databases decay by around 2.1 percent every month, close to a quarter of your list a year.
Email, socials, SMS, WhatsApp and calls, with the conversation history following the prospect across all of them. The channel count matters less than the reason for writing, and it isn't close. Volume without targeting takes the shortest route to a blocked domain, because Google holds bulk senders to a spam complaint rate below 0.3 percent and a list nobody filtered walks straight into it.
The agent answers the prospect's questions from your own documentation, scores the thread against your playbook and routes what clears the bar. A human joins once the conversation deserves one. That scoring step is where the two families separate again, because an assistive agent shows you the score and an autonomous one acts on it.
Sorted into the two types rather than ranked one to ten, because the type decides far more than the ranking does. Six of these run the loop on their own. Four sit next to a rep who still presses send. And the first one charges for a team rather than for a seat, which changes the arithmetic more than anything you'll read below.
Autonomous agents. They start from your ICP and end at a booked meeting.
Gojiberry runs two AI agents for teams of two to ten that haven't got traffic or a list yet. The first watches more than 30 buying signals: job changes, funding rounds, hiring, competitor engagement. The second writes to whatever clears your ICP filter, with the signal attached as the reason for writing.

A free plan opens the door. Pro costs 99 dollars a month for the whole team: 2 AI agents, 1,800 prospects contacted, and you're free to stop in month two.
Nothing else here charges per team instead of per seat. What we need back is a market that leaves traces, because quiet buyers don't give an intent layer much to read.
Artisan sells Ava, a virtual BDR for teams that would rather hand the job over than operate a tool. She pulls from a bundled database, writes the sequences, answers replies and books the meeting. An autonomy setting decides how much she sends before you've read it.

The pricing page shows Team, Scale and Enterprise, and you won't find a figure next to any of them. Third-party write-ups put annual contracts around 50,000 dollars.
Every plan ships with a CSM and a guided rollout. None of them ships with a number you can put in next year's budget before you take the call.
11x sells two workers: Alice for outbound and Julian for the phone. Alice prospects, personalizes, handles replies and books meetings. The managed infrastructure carries the pitch, because mailboxes, domain setup, warmup and rotation live inside the plan rather than beside it.

Growth starts at 3,750 dollars a month billed annually for up to 5 end users and 2,000 new prospects. The FAQ quotes 36,000 a year, so you'll want to ask which number applies. We mapped the best 11x alternatives separately.
Bundling the mailboxes and the warmup removes four line items that usually surprise people. Then you read the entry price, and you're weighing Alice against an SDR salary.
AiSDR does the thing almost nobody else here does: it publishes every tier. The agent researches each contact, writes, follows up and hands you the replies, and the meter counts researched contacts rather than seats, so you're not paying for headcount.

Solo costs 250 dollars a month for 200 researched contacts, Explore 900 for 800 and Scale 2,500 for 2,500. Only Solo runs contract free, so the tiers above want a quarter up front.
Publishing the whole grid counts as a feature on its own here. The catch waits between the tiers, where each step triples the allowance and the invoice that's attached to it.
Alta runs three named agents on one shared data layer: Katie for outbound, Alex for inbound and calls, Luna for pipeline reporting. The product aims at revenue teams that employ somebody to own the tooling, and you'll hear that in the price.

Alta publishes no grid, and you can't sign yourself up. The Salesforce AppExchange showed a Starter tier at 1,250 dollars per company per month in August 2026, and our full Alta HQ review covers what buyers report paying.
That entry price plus the configuration hours ends the conversation for most teams of two to ten. Above that headcount it's a different product.
Topo builds in Europe and runs signal-driven outbound: it watches accounts, researches them and drafts sequences a rep approves. European hosting and GDPR handling lead the pitch, and that's the reason a European buyer shortlists it at all.

Topo publishes no grid. Third-party listings report 69 euros per user per month, which we couldn't confirm on the vendor page. We also ranked the best Topo.io alternatives.
Per-seat billing decides this one. Three reps triple the line, and a European team still won't find a closer fit among US-built agents.
Assistive agents. They make a rep faster and they leave the sending to that rep.
Clay hands you a workspace where you build the data engine yourself: tables, waterfalls that chain provider after provider on one field, scoring and routing. Nothing runs until somebody designs it, and in a team of five that somebody's usually the founder.

Launch costs 185 dollars a month, or 167 on annual billing, with 2,500 Data Credits and 15,000 Actions. Growth costs 495. Seats stay unlimited, and we broke down what Clay really costs.
Building is where it costs you. Fill rate is where it pays you back.
Apollo pairs a large contact database with a sequencer and layers AI assistance across both. It drafts, scores and suggests while a rep runs the motion. Data and sending arrive on one invoice, which is why it's the account so many small teams open first.

Basic costs 49 dollars per user per month on annual billing, 59 month to month. Professional runs 79 and Organization 119 with a three-seat minimum. Credits move the rest, so we walked through what Apollo really costs.
One invoice instead of three is the argument for Apollo, and the credit meter is the argument against it.
Gong records your calls, reads them and coaches the rep who made them. It won't find you an account and it won't send a message. It tells you why the last twenty conversations went the way they did, which is a different job from filling a pipeline.

Gong doesn't publish a price. Buyers report a platform fee plus a per-seat charge, and that fee alone puts it beyond most small-team budgets.
Sharpest tool here for a team that already talks to enough people. It does nothing at all about the half of the job that finds them, and it doesn't pretend to.
Cognism sells European contact data with phone verification and intent topics, and it feeds a process a human runs. Phone-verified mobiles are the reason teams pay for it, especially where cheaper databases run thin.

Cognism doesn't publish a grid either. Plans run on an annual platform fee plus per-seat licenses, and a rep quotes them.
The annual contract ends it for most teams of two to ten. For the ones it doesn't, nothing else here matches its European mobile coverage.
Stop guessing who to contact
Gojiberry spots the accounts that moved this week, checks them against your ICP, and writes before anyone else does.
Get your first leads for freeThis category runs from 99 dollars a month to more than 45,000 dollars a year for products that describe themselves in almost identical words. The spread is the story, and not one page ranking on this query opens with it. Every figure below comes from the vendor's own page in August 2026, except where the sentence says otherwise.
Three variables decide what lands on the invoice, and none of them appears in the headline number.
Run the math for a team of three
Three reps on Apollo Basic pay 147 dollars a month on annual billing, or 1,764 dollars a year, before you've topped up a single credit. The same three people on Gojiberry pay 99 a month, or 1,188 a year, because the price covers the team rather than the seat. 11x Growth starts at 45,000 dollars a year for those same three people.
GTE Localize booked 100+ meetings at the small end of that range after swapping volume email for intent-based outreach. Read the GTE Localize case study
Ask that on a public forum and you'll get a straight answer from people who have tested more than a hundred of these tools: AI saves real time and it doesn't replace your sales team. Every vendor listicle on this results page skips the second half of that sentence. We'd rather lead with it, because everything else on this page depends on you believing us.
Then the evidence, such as it is. No independent body audits reply rates in this market, and nobody's run one identical list through ten agents and published what came back. Every figure circulating on this query comes from a vendor, and ours come from us. Treat them as customer stories rather than benchmarks, and ask for the sample size before you believe any of them. Here are ours, one customer at a time, with the customer named.
Wispra
Rebuilt its outbound around intent signals and now sources 60 percent of its weekly demos that way.
Read the case studyMindflow
Stopped spraying its ICP, wrote only to accounts that had moved, and lifted its reply rate by 31 percent.
Read the case studyGTE Localize
Shifted from volume email to intent-driven outreach and passed 100 meetings booked.
Read the case studyBaur Software
Runs the same motion on a smaller team and doubled its network without losing the personal tone.
Read the case studyNow the limit that decides whether any of this works for you. A signal engine reads what your market leaves behind: a job change, a funding round, a hire, a post, an interaction with a competitor. When your buyers leave no trace online, no signal engine invents activity that isn't there. Sell to rural contractors who never post, to public bodies that announce nothing, or to a market of forty companies you already know by name, and an intent layer adds very little.
Six situations cover almost everyone who's reading this. Find the line that sounds like your month, and note that which agent fits where your leads come from sorts the same question by traffic instead of by autonomy.
You need pipeline and nobody has time to build lists
Autonomous, and start with Gojiberry. The list is the bottleneck here, and a copilot sharpens a list you haven't got yet.
Your reps sell well and just need better preparation
Assistive. Clay builds the research layer and Gong reads the calls back to them. Neither one's adding names to the top of the funnel.
You want the machine to handle inbound enquiries
An inbound qualification agent rather than either family above. Gojiberry works the outbound half, so the two sit side by side and they aren't competing for the same budget line.
You want to approve every message before it goes
Assistive by default, because full autonomy defeats the point you're making. We give you an approval step too, so come to us instead when the list is the thin part rather than the wording.
You have a RevOps person and a real budget
Alta or Artisan. Both reward a team that can pour hours into configuration, and both price against a headcount you've already got.
Your budget is a few hundred a month and your team is three
Gojiberry, on the arithmetic alone. A flat 99 dollars covers all three of you, and every per-seat tool above triples that before you've started.
It runs the repetitive half of a sales development job. It builds a target list from databases and live signals, qualifies what it finds against your criteria, writes and sends outreach across email and socials, handles the first replies and updates your CRM behind it. The part it doesn't do is judgment. You set the ICP, you approve the positioning and you take the call.
The range runs from 99 dollars a month to more than 45,000 dollars a year for tools that describe themselves in the same words. Gojiberry charges 99 a month for the team. Apollo charges 49 per user per month on annual billing. AiSDR starts at 250 a month, Alta lists 1,250 on the AppExchange, and 11x Growth starts at 3,750 a month billed annually. Artisan, Gong and Cognism don't publish anything at all.
Nobody holds that title across the board, and any page that hands it out has skipped the question that matters: which family you need. For a team of two to ten with no list and no traffic, an autonomous agent on a flat team price does the most work per euro, which is where we put Gojiberry. For a team whose reps already sell well, you'll get more back from Clay or Gong.
No meaningful free tier exists in this category. Several vendors open a door, Gojiberry included, and every one of those doors caps the volume below anything you'd call a campaign. Treat a free plan as a way to see the interface and the data quality on your own market. The moment you send at volume, you're on a paid plan.
It replaces the repetitive half of the job and it leaves the other half alone. Reps who tested more than a hundred of these tools keep reporting the same thing: AI saves real hours on list building, research and first drafts, and it doesn't replace a sales team. An agent nobody supervises produces volume rather than pipeline.
AI SDR describes a job. AI agent describes an architecture. Vendors say AI SDR when the product covers a development rep's whole routine, from list building to booking, and they price it against a salary. AI agent covers anything that decides and acts on its own, including a chat widget or a workflow you built yourself. Every AI SDR counts as an AI agent, and most AI agents do something far narrower.
They work when the billing model fits two people, and most of this category prices for twenty. Watch three things: whether the plan charges per seat or per team, whether contact data comes bundled or on a second invoice, and whether the vendor wants a quarter or a year up front. Two people can run an autonomous agent well, and they can't run a configuration project.
Some can. 11x sells Julian for the phone, Alta gives Alex an AI voice conversation, and Artisan offers a dialer add-on that briefs a human before the call. Apollo and Cognism supply the numbers, and they don't make the call. Check whether the voice agent talks to the prospect or only prepares your rep, because vendors use the same word for both.
The shape of this page comes out of a routine we ran by hand for two years, long before any of these ten tools existed in the shape they've got today.
This started as a problem we had
Before Gojiberry, we ran Coco.ai. Roman spent his days prospecting on socials, and he kept noticing the same thing: the people who replied were never the ones on any list. They'd just changed jobs, just posted about a problem, or just started following a competitor. So he chased those signals one browser tab at a time, and it worked well enough to keep him at it for months.
It also stopped scaling around thirty accounts. Past that the reason for writing collapses first, and a month later you're running mass outreach with a first name variable in it. We lived the problem before we built anything for it, and that is why Gojiberry starts from the signal rather than from a database.
A team of two to ten needs neither an AI employee priced against a salary nor a canvas to build one on. It needs the list to arrive already sorted, on a price that doesn't move when the third rep joins.
Let Gojiberry find them
Tell Gojiberry who you sell to and its agents start finding companies showing buying signals. One price for the team, no annual contract, no RevOps person required.
Start free on your marketSee the client resultsStart Now and Get New High Intent Leads Delivered Straight to Slack or Your Inbox.